Scale

For your Wargames Wittering
User avatar
goat major
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6622
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:32 pm
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Scale

Post by goat major »

Paul wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:09 pm
Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:57 pm AFVs formed up wheel to wheel in any scale or period.
No Flames of War or 40k for you then.....good man :D
Thats how they fought in the 41st Millenium. If you don't want to play games that are historically accurate then thats up to you i guess
Goaty bloggy thing http://goatmajor.org.uk
Goaty twitty thing http://www.twitter.com/GoatMajor
User avatar
BaronVonWreckedoften
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:32 pm
Location: The wilds of Surrey

Re: Scale

Post by BaronVonWreckedoften »

After you with that time machine, Mr Goat.
Kein Plan überlebt den ersten Kontakt mit den Würfeln. (No plan survives the first contact with the dice.)
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: Scale

Post by Jeremy »

goat major wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:52 pm
Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:57 pm Anything below brigade level in ACW.
What is it about ACW skirmish that you dont like so much ? i'm not a big ACW fan but isnt there lots of opportunity for raids etc in this period ?
I agree with EB. Yes there is loads of potential, but it feels too much like Napoleonics and not ACW at that level.
User avatar
Essex Boy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6504
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:22 pm
Location: South Essex
Contact:

Re: Scale

Post by Essex Boy »

goat major wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:52 pm
Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:57 pm Anything below brigade level in ACW.
What is it about ACW skirmish that you dont like so much ? i'm not a big ACW fan but isnt there lots of opportunity for raids etc in this period ?
I have no idea. Unlike skirmishing with pike and wheel to wheel tanks where I can point at a specific issues, I can see no logical reason to shy away from small scale ACW. I just don't like it.
User avatar
Essex Boy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6504
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:22 pm
Location: South Essex
Contact:

Re: Scale

Post by Essex Boy »

goat major wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:53 pm
Paul wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:09 pm
Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:57 pm AFVs formed up wheel to wheel in any scale or period.
No Flames of War or 40k for you then.....good man :D
Thats how they fought in the 41st Millenium. If you don't want to play games that are historically accurate then thats up to you i guess
:clappy:
User avatar
goat major
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6622
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:32 pm
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Scale

Post by goat major »

Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:09 pm
goat major wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:52 pm
Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:57 pm Anything below brigade level in ACW.
What is it about ACW skirmish that you dont like so much ? i'm not a big ACW fan but isnt there lots of opportunity for raids etc in this period ?
I have no idea. Unlike skirmishing with pike and wheel to wheel tanks where I can point at a specific issues, I can see no logical reason to shy away from small scale ACW. I just don't like it.
that's a pretty good reason
Goaty bloggy thing http://goatmajor.org.uk
Goaty twitty thing http://www.twitter.com/GoatMajor
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4601
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: Scale

Post by Paul »

goat major wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:53 pm
Paul wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:09 pm
Essex Boy wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:57 pm AFVs formed up wheel to wheel in any scale or period.
No Flames of War or 40k for you then.....good man :D
Thats how they fought in the 41st Millenium. If you don't want to play games that are historically accurate then thats up to you i guess
Can't argue with that :D
User avatar
grizzlymc
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9619
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
Location: Sunny Sydney
Contact:

Re: Scale

Post by grizzlymc »

It seems that as tech gets better, large scale battles start to get a bit boardgamey. Phil Barker once wrote that the ideal wargaming scale is the largest area where the commander could see most of the battlefield. Hence his Wellingtonics at div - corps level and his WWII at coy-Bn level.
User avatar
World2dave
Jezebel
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:31 am
Location: In the Middle
Contact:

Re: Scale

Post by World2dave »

That's actually very sensible. I bet you've summarised it down from 4 pages of exceptions and codicils though.
tim.w
Jezebel
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:21 am
Location: York

Re: Scale

Post by tim.w »

I'll play anything. Myself and Hotel can make anything an effective skirmish game, same set of rules, just different looking figures with a different narrative.

I can see where you're all comming from though. Dark Age big battles don't feel right, were there even that many? Hastings, Stamford Bridge and such seem to have been big massive riots for all I've read, not much in the way of making tactical descisions but I'm no expert.

Also big battle WWII just seems too complex to effectively intergrate combined arms warfare into an interesting game. Though there is a board game that allows you to play the entire war, doesnt appeal though, not with miniatures.

I completely get EB's eyebrow raise at a pike skirmish too, perhaps that's what the pikemen were lamenting? I mean, a group of 12 pikemen giving a handfull of horse a bit of a prod seems wrong historically. But then if it works for Lion Rampant?
Post Reply