Infamy, infamy

[grizzlymc]

Tis a silly place

[FreddBloggs]

Why gas it taken them down? Any ideas?

[grizzlymc]

Bill is a bit humour challenged and he seems to have something against Lardies.

[Etranger]

Bill is a bit humour challenged and he seems to have something against Lardies.

Rich called him out for being the dickhead that he is a year or so back. It's Bill's usual petulant behaviour that occurs when someone crosses him. He's done just the same with other businesses that don't toe the TMP line.

[FreddBloggs]

Ahhhhh right, I remember him being called out, but not associated that with this aftermath

[grizzlymc]

ow, can an infamy fanboy tell me how it is different from Dux?

[Jeremy]

Why gas it taken them down? Any ideas?

Because it was viewed as advertising according to Rich. So you can’t ask what figures to use for a rule set because now you are advertising said rule set

[Jeremy]

ow, can an infamy fanboy tell me how it is different from Dux?

Very, very different. Dux has no Tiffin card, no ambush or deployment points, no signa cards, no rally points, no formal command structure, no ‘all in’ in combat, units are a different size and many other different features. Dux must be about 10 years old now and reflects that

[BaronVonWreckedoften]

I've not played either, but have formed the impression that Dux is more campaign-oriented, whereas "Aye-Aye" is focussed more on the actual fisticuffs - is that correct? Also, they are distinct periods and the melee/combat, and morale/training rules reflect a specific time frame - again, correct or not?

[Jeremy]

Baron, the heart of Infamy! Is the campaign, however it is an entirely different type of campaign to Dux. The campaign ends when you have your procession in Rome for defeating the tribes, or you are assassinated by Rome because of your infamy. The same for the Barbarians.

We don’t know if different time periods fight differently as we don’t have any yet. The Romans all have similar drill access, merely different force make up