Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

For Loose Games & Shows.
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by Jeremy »

I’d like to see GM get his Lace Hulk project going and play in that.
User avatar
goat major
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6526
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:32 pm
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by goat major »

[stares]
Goaty bloggy thing http://goatmajor.org.uk
Goaty twitty thing http://www.twitter.com/GoatMajor
Jamanicus
Fallen Woman
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 8:12 pm
Location: Bury, Manchester

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by Jamanicus »

I'd be keen to do some ECW period gaming, but with some limitations on force sizes, so it doesn't mean so much painting for those that aren't as keen.

Given the very positive vibes in November (and at Shedcon), I've already got one with painting and buying a few bits and extra pieces...as you can imagine this thread is slightly irksome 🙈
User avatar
Buff Redux
PurpleBot
Posts: 714
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 9:20 am

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by Buff Redux »

Sod changing 2023, let's change next week's plan. We should do WRG 6th with a side game of Hordes Of The Things for those that can't face Ancients.

As has been mentioned, much will change over the weekend and again on Sunday night when you're all pissed. If there is no love for a big 17th Century game I'll go for a smaller Pikeman's Lament force.
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by Jeremy »

The VBCW Ayton was brilliant. Small forces and several games alongside each other with a big game on the Sunday.

I’d be keen to see that recreated in Dark Age form. I’m sure we can think of a reason why dark age hairies want to fight over the village of Ayton.
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by Jeremy »

goat major wrote: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:24 am[stares]
I’m positively enabling you. Besides, you know it will be awesome
User avatar
BaronVonWreckedoften
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9050
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:32 pm
Location: The wilds of Surrey

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by BaronVonWreckedoften »

MarshalNey wrote: Thu Apr 21, 2022 8:14 pm Before I depart this earth, I would like to do the 100 days campaign.
Just so we're clear, is that the Napoleonic one, or the World War One one?
Kein Plan überlebt den ersten Kontakt mit den Würfeln. (No plan survives the first contact with the dice.)
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
User avatar
BaronVonWreckedoften
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9050
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:32 pm
Location: The wilds of Surrey

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by BaronVonWreckedoften »

Jeremy wrote: Fri Apr 22, 2022 10:19 am I’m sure we can think of a reason why dark age hairies want to fight over the village of Ayton.
Well, Gaynor would probably have looked a bit younger back then.
Kein Plan überlebt den ersten Kontakt mit den Würfeln. (No plan survives the first contact with the dice.)
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4496
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by Paul »

Jamanicus wrote: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:39 am Given the very positive vibes in November (and at Shedcon), I've already got one with painting and buying a few bits and extra pieces...as you can imagine this thread is slightly irksome 🙈
No reason why anything should change for the main plan. I think the old Count was just trying to firm up a "bolt hole" for those who were less interested in the C17th game.
User avatar
MarshalNey
Gaynor
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:55 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: Ayton 2023 Non C17th...

Post by MarshalNey »

Just so we're clear, is that the Napoleonic one, or the World War One one?
Napoleonic, I didn't realise there was another.
Post Reply