Ayton2: - 26th ~ 28th November 2021, thus far....

[Buff Orpington]

Possible fallback location at Barnard Castle?

[grizzlymc]

[Vintage Wargaming]

Possible fallback location at Barnard Castle?

Can’t see it myself

[Jeremy]

Possible fallback location at Barnard Castle?

Can’t see it myself

How will we all coordinate our wives birthdays if we are to do this?

[grizzlymc]

Second wife, shared amongst all. Purp's would be happy to oblige.

[tim.w]

Possible fallback location at Barnard Castle?

Can’t see it myself

Visionary!

[BaronVonWreckedoften]

This is be-cumming silly now.....

[Vintage Wargaming]

I know. He did make a bit of a spectacle of himself, didn’t he? No, I meant he made a bit of a testicle of himself.

[Buff Orpington]

Being relentlessly positive I think it's time we started discussing the fine details. What's the general opinion on Distinctions and Deficiencies for the main AGW game?
My own views are:
1: Generally we could allow 1 distinction for every 2 or 3 units in a force. There is little point having Guards units unless they are better at something.

2: An additional distinction for every deficiency taken so if the Mudshire Militia have Poor Drill another unit in the brigade could have an additional distinction. It might be possible to class the Mudshires as Poor Drill, Brittle, Bad Shots and Nervous to gain 4 distinctions on other units but it wouldn't be gentlemanly.

3: Units that gained a battle honour last year would retain it, over and above the limit. Consistent good performance should be rewarded. I have to confess that my best performing unit was the light infantry that Tim H loaned to me. They definitely deserve recognition as Iain will grudgingly testify.

[tim.w]

Sounds good, my Gordons were legendary last year.