LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

For your Wargames Wittering
User avatar
RMD
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3576
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by RMD »

Etranger wrote: Tue Feb 18, 2020 10:04 pm They're for his Dutch East Indies force. They'll give the Japanese a bit of a shock.
That's right. However, they've been modified for KNIL service: two tanks in each platoon can only traverse right, while the other two can only traverse left. It's traditional.
User avatar
RMD
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3576
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by RMD »

For a bit of extra fun, some of the Brigade Anti-Tank Companies and possibly one or two of the Recce Battalions still had AMX-13/105 light tanks on the books at the start of the 1980s.
Etranger
Jezebel
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:10 am
Location: The Athens of the South

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by Etranger »

I "could" deploy Centurions & AMX 13 from the 'reserves' deployed in the shed.

Did the British ever deploy Centurions to Malaysia? I know they had some in HK & of course the Australians had them in Vietnam.

Paras and Centurion I' s Vs Viet Minh or Indonesian rebels are a "what if"!
User avatar
grizzlymc
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9619
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
Location: Sunny Sydney
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by grizzlymc »

At the defence of Coral centurions were firing flechettes, I have never heard of tanks in either the Malayan emergency or in Konfrontasi. The jungles are very different. Vietnam was generally more open forest than Malaya and Borneo where the third layer was much thicker.
User avatar
Count Belisarius
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4496
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 2:13 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by Count Belisarius »

Points updated... 61 28mm foot for me. 305 pts

I am a cheating bastard! 30 of those were done on January! Total adjusted...
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by Jeremy »

21 infantry, 7 cavalry, 1 elephant and a dog. Counting the elephant as a vehicle and the dog as a figure, that’s 200 points.
Etranger
Jezebel
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:10 am
Location: The Athens of the South

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by Etranger »

grizzlymc wrote: Wed Feb 19, 2020 7:39 am At the defence of Coral centurions were firing flechettes, I have never heard of tanks in either the Malayan emergency or in Konfrontasi. The jungles are very different. Vietnam was generally more open forest than Malaya and Borneo where the third layer was much thicker.
Nor I, although the British did deploy armoured cars etc. The Japanese didn't have much trouble deploying tanks in 1941-42.
User avatar
grizzlymc
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9619
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
Location: Sunny Sydney
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by grizzlymc »

True, but they seem to have stayed on the roads, perhaps that's why the Brits stuck with wheels in the emergency.
User avatar
RMD
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3576
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by RMD »

No idea re Cents in the Far East, sorry. Yes, the British used Saladins and Ferrets in Malaya and Borneo, but as discussed they were restricted to the road network, the same as the Japanese tanks had been in 1942 (Slim River, etc) and again when they invaded Burma. In the Burma Campaign, the only time you really saw open-country tank manoeuvres in Burma unshackled from the road network was when they were fighting on the central Burmese 'Dry Belt' in 1942 and 1945, or on the Imphal Plain in 1944.
User avatar
grizzlymc
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9619
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
Location: Sunny Sydney
Contact:

Re: LAW 2020 Painting Challenge

Post by grizzlymc »

Am I correct that the Brits in Burma never had an armoured division, it was just armoured brigades?
Post Reply