Page 27 of 37

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:18 pm
by Essex Boy
goat major wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:27 pm its appears to be gravitating towards 28mm, imaginations, probably more 17thC than 16thC, probably a basing-independent simple ruleset such as Pike & Shotte.

None of these are decisions - just how i've read the the thread so far.
That's pretty much my understanding.

E

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:19 pm
by Essex Boy
Excellent, I can buy some toys with a clear conscience.

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:27 pm
by Purple
I blame Valleyboys friend for this.

Are you thinking this is for the 10 year anniversary game?
I think we should have T-shirt’s made.

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:31 pm
by Jeremy
I think we should all get tattoos of each other’s faces on our backs

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:41 pm
by Stormwatcher
Coming late to this thread... And since I have never been to an Ayton game, take my tuppence with a pinch of salt...
However... For what it's worth, when it comes to ECW, I have always used the "1644" rules, and amongst gentlemen / friends playing a non-competitive game, they're very good (oh, wait, of course... That won't do then!).
I've also used them for TYW games and they have always worked well.

I am now looking at Baroque for a new project - an earlier period (1560s), and as it happens a little bit of image-nations thrown in. The rules look interesting (and I like the prospect of BIG bases for Tercios etc), although I haven't actually played them yet. Might give them a trial run with my TYW stuff while I wait for the new 1560s forces to build up.

Good luck with your Renaissance ramblings....
Phil

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:09 pm
by Buff Orpington
So, sort of assuming that we are probably going to do this in 28mm without going ridiculously over the top on force sizes :evilgrin: and without stressing ourselves out how many figures are we going to need?
50-60 foot
2-3 guns
A few horsy people?

Asking for a friend you understand.

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:16 pm
by Jeremy
At least 200 foot, 60 cavalry and a dozen guns is where we all know it will end up!

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:29 pm
by Buff Orpington
My friend has just bought the King & Country starter set.

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:30 pm
by garyp
IF you go down the Pike and Shotte route a basic infantry unit is 12-16 pike and 16-24 shot (although they're represented on the table as 3 units, but let's not go there at the moment) and a cavalry unit is typically 6-8 figures. Having said that, it's really up to us what constitutes a 'standard' unit and you can also have 'large' and 'small' units. A force of 3 or 4 infantry units, half a dozen cavalry units and a couple of guns gives a good evening's gaming.


So about 3 times that for you megalomaniacs . .

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:31 pm
by garyp
Of course I'm talking myself into a corner here. Having built a fairly substantial ECW army in 20mm I guess I'll have to do it again in 28mm.