Page 29 of 37
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:58 pm
by goat major
That would be my preference
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:14 pm
by Jeremy
And besides, I’m quite looking forward to an Ayton where I don’t have to paint anything. Of course I will end up painting stuff. But I don’t HAVE to
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:33 pm
by Essex Boy
My understanding is that we'll return to 18thC for the tenth Ayton.
17thC may happen year 11 or 12.
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:39 pm
by Buff Orpington
Oh good, my friend now has 2 years to paint them.
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:04 pm
by garyp
Jeremy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:14 pm
And besides, I’m quite looking forward to an Ayton where I don’t have to paint anything. Of course I will end up painting stuff. But I don’t HAVE to
Don't be silly Jeremy. Of course you have to
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:06 pm
by Buff Orpington
So, Battle of Ayton with Royalists v Parliament with a side order of Scots, Irish, French, Dutch and Polish Winged Lancers. Anyone bringing Samurai?
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:09 pm
by goat major
I’m more down the line of Aztecs
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:10 pm
by World2dave
I think 18th century still makes sense for the 10th Ayton, and something new and with small beginnings (like free-form/imaginations 17th century) would be great for the 11th.
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:14 pm
by goat major
Dave speaks sense
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:17 pm
by Jeremy
So if it’s the 10th anniversary, everyone needs at least 10 battalions of foot, 10 regiments of cavalry and 10 batteries?