Page 33 of 37
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:54 pm
by Buff Orpington
Only because none of the army lists include elephants.
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:31 pm
by FreddBloggs
Hmm Moghuls.....
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:11 pm
by Buff Orpington
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:23 am
by Jeremy
There’s also Simon Millers version for To the Strongest. For King and Parliament. From what I’ve seen, it looks quite good
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:28 am
by FreddBloggs
It is, but ghis group has an aversion to gridded tables.
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:30 am
by goat major
by group do you mean all 65 members ?
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:46 am
by FreddBloggs
That makes us a battle by dark ages standards....
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:49 am
by Buff Orpington
Does anyone know how Old Glory ECW figures look if placed against Warlord's plastics?
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:50 am
by goat major
you mean its down to us to repel the Saxon hordes ? how reassuring.
TSS is excellent and i guess the ECW version is good too. I don't like playing cards on the table but other than that i really like it. I suspect some may disagree though. I'd guess that P&S is a better common denominator for a LAW game
Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:14 am
by FreddBloggs
What I really like about tss is the speed it plays at, with no measuring or millimetre discussions on flank hitting etc, you feel in command. And the fact you can base how you like helps.