The Loose Association of Wargamers

grizzlymc wrote: ↑Fri Jan 04, 2019 10:52 pm Are you going to shove those wolves up Jeremy's BUM.

My BUM isn’t afraid of a bit of dogging

Or a euphemism.

I think I'm painting about 35 armed rozzers with attitude for Ayton, what does that count as?

3 points. Budget cuts and all that. It’s in all the papers.

S'true enough.

I've updated the table... If we are OK going with the new scoring I'll remove the old list? It does penalise the 15mm bods (me included though...) as drops them to 2....

Count Belisarius wrote: ↑Sat Jan 05, 2019 7:54 pm I've updated the table... If we are OK going with the new scoring I'll remove the old list? It does penalise the 15mm bods (me included though...) as drops them to 2....

Have I missed something? Why do that? There's a stack more work to do on a 15mm figure than a 10mm.

Leave it as it was. If not, re-class AB Wellingtonics as 20mm...

And as everyone knows, painting toy planes is very hard work because of all the drilling and inserting that you have to do. We should have exemptions.

grizzlymc wrote: ↑Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:29 am And as everyone knows, painting toy planes is very hard work because of all the drilling and inserting that you have to do. We should have exemptions.

Yeah, that did come up last time - the prime reason for me is that aircraft are a hell of a lot larger than vehicles and take a lot longer to paint. I'd peg them alongside buildings.

And we'll have none of that bloody 1/144th aircraft being described as '15mm' malarkey, either...

My 1:200 are obviously 10mm.
My 1:300 are 6mm

And I think that one ought to get credit for photoshopping large numbers, because that takes time too. Maybe 1/10 points per figure.

And a bonus point for the correct shade of union blue.