The Loose Association of Wargamers

He’s working on a Viking adaption for Infamy! He’s got some really cool ideas for shieldwalls, etc.

That would be interesting, though you wonder what happens to Dux, if Infamy gets stretched from 200BC to 1000 CE.

And I have been tempted by Narvik scenarios for CoC, although up until now, I have been put off by the need to build new terrain.

Shahbahraz wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:32 am That would be interesting, though you wonder what happens to Dux, if Infamy gets stretched from 200BC to 1000 CE.

Nothing. It will still be a great set of rules which those who want to play, will do. Olve isn’t planning on doing the intervening years so Dux won’t be impacted.

I doubt I’d play a Arthurian Infamy! bolt on

a big chuink of what makes Dux is the campaign side. Is that in Infamy?

FreddBloggs wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:39 am a big chuink of what makes Dux is the campaign side. Is that in Infamy?

Yes. But suitable for the period it represents. It would have to be completely rewritten for later periods.

Plus (and possibly more importantly) the puns don't work.

There are puns?

February continues my 1940 project but this month it is Germans. Starting with (someone restrain Andy, he’s going to get far too excited) - fallschirmjaeger.

What colour?

Of course, it's Fallschirmjager February now! To keep with the theme I've got Fallschirmjager StuG Brigade 12 on the painting desk. Apparently at least some of the crews were jump qualified. https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=138252