The Loose Association of Wargamers

Essex Boy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:28 am I'd take the easy option of getting Andy to buy some, but a man needs a challenge.

Just order extra and sell him the excess?

BaronVonWreckedoften wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 2:21 pm

Essex Boy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:28 am I'd take the easy option of getting Andy to buy some, but a man needs a challenge.

Just order extra and sell him the excess?

That tends not to work so well.

Is buying them back from him afterwards an issue?

BaronVonWreckedoften wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 5:27 pm Is buying them back from him afterwards an issue?

It's complicated. Very complicated. In fact, I'm not entirely sure I understand the arrangement.

Some sort of leveraged lease buy-back scheme then.

He'd probably accept the shed as security.

It’s the upside down put option where the strike price is a function of the number of shades of blue and the 90 day volatility in the frozen lettuce futures index that confuses EB.

Either that or the concept of buying what you want/need, painting it and then keeping it to play wargames with yourself.

(By the way, the shed would never be accepted as security, structures must have permanent foundations. The freezer on the other hand....)

Dog who drinks paint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:42 pm
(By the way, the shed would never be accepted as security, structures must have permanent foundations. The freezer on the other hand....)

I'm thinking Rudolf Maierhofer (ECJ C 315/00).

The tax authorities (and ECJ for that matter) can think what they like, I’d just never get it past Group Risk Management. If there’s a risk that something won’t be there when Jeff and the lads from Collections show up, we ain’t taking it as security.

I couldn't possibly discuss. Schrems II 2020.