The Loose Association of Wargamers

In his defense, he does talk about that in his podcast. The Celts were civilized, the barbarians he’s referring to are the Germans. He’s even hypothesizing how they will fight differently.

Ahhhh, don't do podcasts, my hearing is not great.

levied troop wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:18 am

Shahbahraz wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:07 pm B*llocks.. now i have to source a list.. for a set of rules I don't own. Perhaps I can be sneaky and persuade opponents to use 'Infamy Infamy' when they are released

I have the same problem (see the Trading thread for a lending library suggestion) but I won’t need any persuasion to use Infamyx2.

Excellent.. I shall look forward to it.. Now where did I leave those Victrix Romans.. might have to get me one more box and a set of Gauls.

And I have the same issue with 'Barbarians' but give Rich his due, he's not taking that approach inside the rules from what we can tell so far.

One of the questions I have is how does it work without romans?

Apparently ok. Each force has different mechanisms

Without romance?

Rob Broom pointed out to me that all the army lists for his WAB successor rules "War and Conquest" are available for free online. So I've been having a peak at those lists and rules too

I've now got the Armies of Antiquity supplement. Doesn't seem to tell me a great deal, thought it would be more Punic specific, I don't know why, just assumed.

It gives you the core army lists for all the armies if antiquity. The Hannibal book gives scenarios