What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
- Buff Orpington
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:26 pm
What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
I was reading something recently about how Mussolini erred in declaring war. With hindsight it is easy to see the flaws in a course of action that ends with you dangling from a lamppost but what of the wider implications?
The writer was of the opinion that neutrality would have helped the Germans as they wouldn't have been drawn into the Mediterranean theatre.
Would it also have left the British with more resources? Perhaps we might have been able to respond to the growing threat from Japan, at the least the Indian forces would not have been in Africa.
The writer was of the opinion that neutrality would have helped the Germans as they wouldn't have been drawn into the Mediterranean theatre.
Would it also have left the British with more resources? Perhaps we might have been able to respond to the growing threat from Japan, at the least the Indian forces would not have been in Africa.
I know when to go out
I know when to stay in
Get things done
I know when to stay in
Get things done
- grizzlymc
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
- Location: Sunny Sydney
- Contact:
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
It would have meant that the route to the Far East was through the Med. Better battleship escort for convoys, more naval assets to deploy to Singapore. Perhaps more assets to Greece, or even an earlier Torch.
Who knows, maybe the Italian Geological Survey might have examined the issue of who was polluting wells in Libya.
Who knows, maybe the Italian Geological Survey might have examined the issue of who was polluting wells in Libya.
-
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: left forum
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
No need for troops in greece, the germans only got involved in the Balkans because the Italians were making a mess of it and asked for help.
Barbarossa would have been launched on its planned date in May. More Empire and allied troops uncommitted in the far east.
Generally a neutral result I think, both the allies and Germany would have gained from it with pure hindsight.
Barbarossa would have been launched on its planned date in May. More Empire and allied troops uncommitted in the far east.
Generally a neutral result I think, both the allies and Germany would have gained from it with pure hindsight.
- BaronVonWreckedoften
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9267
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:32 pm
- Location: The wilds of Surrey
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
The plot of Captain Corelli's Mandolin would have been pretty slim.
Kein Plan überlebt den ersten Kontakt mit den Würfeln. (No plan survives the first contact with the dice.)
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
The farms of North Yorkshire wouldn't have had all the Italians from Eden Camp and would have had to resort to students.
Not unlike today.
Not unlike today.
- levied troop
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:05 pm
- Location: I’m in the phone box, the one across the hall
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
There’s a review in this weeks Guardian of ‘Mussolini’s War: Facist Italy from Triumph to Collapse’ by John Gooch which argues that Italy was deficient in all resources required for war and was heavily dependent on on a Germany often reluctant to supply it but happy to use it as a distraction.
I get lockdown, but I get up again.
-
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: left forum
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
Italy was basically set up to be a colonial army with only a small cadre ready for european war. Sound familiar?
-
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 4630
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:15 am
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
No Balkan war means no post-war Soviet dominance of the Balkan nations.
- grizzlymc
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
- Location: Sunny Sydney
- Contact:
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
Oooh, I'm not so sure of that. Maybe an Austrian type solution might have been worked out.
- Vintage Wargaming
- PurpleBot
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:16 pm
- Location: North East England
- Contact:
Re: What if Italy had stayed neutral in WWII?
What a mistake-a to make-a
You can never have too much of something you never needed to start with
Some of my blogs:
http://vintagewargaming.blogspot.co.uk/
http://findthatfigure.blogspot.co.uk/
http://tankdevelopment.blogspot.co.uk/
http://georland.blogspot.co.uk/
Some of my blogs:
http://vintagewargaming.blogspot.co.uk/
http://findthatfigure.blogspot.co.uk/
http://tankdevelopment.blogspot.co.uk/
http://georland.blogspot.co.uk/