Valleyboy's ECW Project

For your gaming pictures & links.
User avatar
Greystreak
First Base
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:30 am

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by Greystreak »

Top work VB! :clappy: :clappy: :clappy:
User avatar
BaronVonWreckedoften
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9382
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:32 pm
Location: The wilds of Surrey

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by BaronVonWreckedoften »

Superb, VB, absolutely superb.
Kein Plan überlebt den ersten Kontakt mit den Würfeln. (No plan survives the first contact with the dice.)
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
Willz the Wargamer
Gaynor
Posts: 1637
Joined: Tue May 21, 2019 8:29 pm
Location: Devon

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by Willz the Wargamer »

Fantastic painting, stop posting now as you know how weak wargamers are to buying more shiny things

Willz.
User avatar
Patrice
Loose Virgin
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2023 11:34 am
Location: Breizh / Brittany
Contact:

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by Patrice »

Very impressive!
valleyboy
Jezebel
Posts: 2836
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:22 pm

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by valleyboy »

Thanks guys, its not all Ive been painting though - have made a start on a 100yw project
Penda
Gaynor
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:02 pm
Location: Wolverhampton
Contact:

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by Penda »

Those are top notch! I especially like the command stands.
There is no point in being stupid if you don't show it!

www.talesfromghq.blogspot.co.uk
www.talesfromrhanzlistan.blogspot.co.uk
User avatar
Spanner
Gaynor
Posts: 1262
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 6:02 pm
Location: NSW south coast

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by Spanner »

Excellent work, VB. Really impressive, mate.
If "The System" is the answer, who asked such a bloody stupid question?
ochoin
Gaynor
Posts: 1697
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:52 am
Location: Brisvegas

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by ochoin »

Not exactly about VB's excellent work but I have a question about ECW flags.

With regard to size, I'm guessing there wasn't some regulation laid down that gave exact dimensions, that was carefully followed?

I have only one unit still awaiting a flag (Covenanter dragoons), so even if I'm told something that blows my preconceptions out of the water, I'm not changing. I'm curious.

So infantry flags were pretty big, Horse flags were a bit "tinsy" & dragoon flags somewhere in the middle? And across the various armies their was no size consensus beyond this?

donald
User avatar
DavidNBA
Loose Virgin
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2024 6:01 pm
Location: Warwickshire
Contact:

Re: Valleyboy's ECW Project

Post by DavidNBA »

Hi Donald, I know of no regulation on size of ECW flags. The surviving infantry flags (a few have dates which are not certain) have the following dimensions; The Gell colour: 6 feet high and 6.5 wide; the 1641 colour: 6.5 feet high by 7 feet wide; the Royal colour 6 feet high by 7 feet 3 inches wide; the Anthony colour 5 feet 9 inches high by 6 feet 7 inches wide. One surviving cavalry standard in Worcestershire is 2 by 2 feet. No dragoon guidon survives, apparently.

I see you have had a reply on this topic on TMP now: http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=584931 which says much the same.

Cheers,

David.
My (mostly 18th century) flag and template blog: https://nba-sywtemplates.blogspot.com/
Post Reply