ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

For your Wargames Wittering
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4623
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by Paul »

Jeremy wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:17 pm So if it’s the 10th anniversary, everyone needs at least 10 battalions of foot, 10 regiments of cavalry and 10 batteries?
So less cavalry then?
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by Jeremy »

Two key words were ‘at least’....

Purps needs to paint more Hussars
tim.w
Jezebel
Posts: 2899
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:21 am
Location: York

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by tim.w »

I lost a post there, I was suggesting a Pikepersons Lament for anyone not 18th Centurying who wanted to begin their armies?
User avatar
goat major
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6645
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:32 pm
Location: North Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by goat major »

Nice idea
Goaty bloggy thing http://goatmajor.org.uk
Goaty twitty thing http://www.twitter.com/GoatMajor
User avatar
levied troop
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3760
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:05 pm
Location: I’m in the phone box, the one across the hall

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by levied troop »

Buff Orpington wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:39 pm Oh good, my friend now has 2 years to paint them.
If he’s anything like my friend he’ll wait 22 months before starting them.
I get lockdown, but I get up again.
User avatar
Tim Hall
Gaynor
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:28 am
Location: Suffolk, in the heart of Merry Olde England

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by Tim Hall »

I was thinking, should we go ahead with this idea, then rather than lay down force sizes and descend into an Ayton arms race, how about visiting a concept that was bandied about in 2011, that of "Bring and Battle". People go off and collect and paint whatever and however many troops they want, and that's what they get to fight with, yes I know it sounds a bit obvious now that I read it, but I think the caveat should be that you keep your force details to yourself. Or something like that. Personally I do not want to go down the old 18th century road again, if you get my drift.
Rules? You ask me what rules do I use. No, I don't do rules.
User avatar
Essex Boy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6508
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:22 pm
Location: South Essex
Contact:

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by Essex Boy »

goat major wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:14 pm Dave speaks sense
He so do.
User avatar
Essex Boy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 6508
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:22 pm
Location: South Essex
Contact:

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by Essex Boy »

Tim Hall wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:05 pm I was thinking, should we go ahead with this idea, then rather than lay down force sizes and descend into an Ayton arms race, how about visiting a concept that was bandied about in 2011, that of "Bring and Battle". People go off and collect and paint whatever and however many troops they want, and that's what they get to fight with, yes I know it sounds a bit obvious now that I read it, but I think the caveat should be that you keep your force details to yourself. Or something like that. Personally I do not want to go down the old 18th century road again, if you get my drift.
Yet again, we agree.

Iain
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4623
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by Paul »

I had always liked the idea of something similar. Everyone has a real £ limit to their force. So if you want to spend it all on Foot, or Artillery or flaming pigs then you can. It limits the forces possible without getting fascistic about points and organisations.
Otherwise as Tim and EB above.
tim.w
Jezebel
Posts: 2899
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:21 am
Location: York

Re: ECW - just for arguments sake you understand

Post by tim.w »

It would be nice for those not 18th'ing in 2020 to have something to work up to. All ideas above are very appealing to me. I'm not fixed to any period or even scale (above 1/72 of course). 17th Cen would be totally new to me, a period I know next to nothing about but I can see myself getting a lot out of it in that respect. I'd throw in Ancients and Medievals too in the same vein and I do already have growing collections there.
Post Reply