What's on your workbench?
-
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: left forum
Re: What's on your workbench?
It is 90% waffle, and 10% bloody obvious. You can gave my copy for postage cost.
Re: What's on your workbench?
Rich Clark was incredibly scathing in his commentarygoat major wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:31 pm I’d be interested in what you think when you’ve finished it. I saw a lot of fairly negative comments on it when it first came out but they mostly came from the anti-bolt action people who would have been negative whatever it said.
-
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: left forum
Re: What's on your workbench?
It mentions tfl, once, in passing, and while dismissing any rules structure rp doesn't like.
- Zenbadger
- Gaynor
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:51 pm
- Location: Derbyshire, land of tarts and plague
- Contact:
Re: What's on your workbench?
There is a lot of irrelevant stuff in it. A whole chapter on figure scale may have some bearing if you are sculpting the figures yourself but from a rules design point of view 20mm is the same as 25mm, 28mm or 32mm.
-
- PurpleBot
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:40 pm
Re: What's on your workbench?
Where can I read said commentary?
I assume the core of the handbook is to roll to hit, then roll to save, at either 33% or 50% increments.
I assume the core of the handbook is to roll to hit, then roll to save, at either 33% or 50% increments.
Jeremy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 7:54 pmRich Clark was incredibly scathing in his commentarygoat major wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:31 pm I’d be interested in what you think when you’ve finished it. I saw a lot of fairly negative comments on it when it first came out but they mostly came from the anti-bolt action people who would have been negative whatever it said.
Re: What's on your workbench?
To be honest, I don’t remember. Either on the TFL blog or his twitter feedHMS Priapus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:50 pm Where can I read said commentary?
I assume the core of the handbook is to roll to hit, then roll to save, at either 33% or 50% increments.
Jeremy wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 7:54 pmRich Clark was incredibly scathing in his commentarygoat major wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:31 pm I’d be interested in what you think when you’ve finished it. I saw a lot of fairly negative comments on it when it first came out but they mostly came from the anti-bolt action people who would have been negative whatever it said.
- World2dave
- Jezebel
- Posts: 2591
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:31 am
- Location: In the Middle
- Contact:
Re: What's on your workbench?
I was underwhelmed by it. It wasn't terrible, just lightweight and not really offering anything new or substantial you could get your teeth into. I suspect that if you followed their advice (and their clearly stated likes/dislikes) you'd end up writing Warhammer/40K. No bad thing necessarily, but I think that's already been done.
It's one of those single-read titles, so if anyone is going to Hammerhead and wants my copy let me know.
It's one of those single-read titles, so if anyone is going to Hammerhead and wants my copy let me know.
-
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: left forum
Re: What's on your workbench?
What I am looking for is a book that helps me write rules, you know puts the technical framework together so others can read it. The ideas and game mechanics side I can do, but a checklist of sections etc. Is where I fall down.
- grizzlymc
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
- Location: Sunny Sydney
- Contact:
Re: What's on your workbench?
You are talking about structured writing. Barker is worth using for a tick box template.
- Count Belisarius
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 2:13 pm
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
- Contact: