Early Warhammer armies explained.

[Jeremy]

WoE = Wanking over Everywhere?

[Purple]

There’s a video here for those of you that fanny about with goblins

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OSS7UzUEqTU

[Buff Orpington]

What a fine figure of a wargamer.

[Zenbadger]

It seems to be out but I don't know anyone who has played it. It isn't making much of a splash around Nottingham anyway. I am more interested in the forthcoming Oathmark rules anyway.

[Jeremy]

Not big here either. I’m holding out for SoTK

[Zenbadger]

SoTK?

[Jeremy]

Sword of the King. A set (hopefully) soon to be released by Mike Hobbs, Ade Deacon and Jim Ibbotson

[Zenbadger]

Can't find anything on it but I'll have a look out for that, thanks.

[Jeremy]

It’s in test play at the moment and will be released under the TFL banner. It uses the Sharp Practice core engine with a lot of tweaks apparently

[Buff Orpington]

One thing that it could be in its favour is that it shouldn't be figure prescriptive. Mantic may have picked up the ball that GW dropped but it still ties your army choice to their range or a usable proxy. I assume Oathmark is similarly tied to their own range.
It's about time that someone did a massed battle system that was as freeform as Dragon Rampant. Why should a system tell you that you can't field dwarf cataphracts just because their company don't make any.