LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
- grizzlymc
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
- Location: Sunny Sydney
- Contact:
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
That hull really looks like a King Tiger, albeit not so well armoured.
- grizzlymc
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
- Location: Sunny Sydney
- Contact:
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
Andy won't be half paqinting a regiment; he'll paint one figure and copy and paste it.
-
- PurpleBot
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:40 pm
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
Now up to a total of 158 6mm foot, plus the small quantity of cavalry, 13 6mm in all, I mentioned earlier.
http://www.looseasswargamers.org.uk/vie ... 812#p30812
http://www.looseasswargamers.org.uk/vie ... 812#p30812
Last edited by HMS Priapus on Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Slugbalancer
- First Base
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:09 pm
- Location: Romford
- Contact:
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
The results for the first quarter of the year are...
21 x 6mm aircraft
72 x 6mm figures
Also finished a 10mm fort & 4 adobe buildings.
21 x 6mm aircraft
72 x 6mm figures
Also finished a 10mm fort & 4 adobe buildings.
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
Hello Slug.
Iain
Iain
- Slugbalancer
- First Base
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:09 pm
- Location: Romford
- Contact:
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
Not even remotely as well armoured… There's a Leopard 1 sawn in half for instructional purposes at Shrivenham College and the armour is paper-thin by post-war standards - about the same level of protection as a Panther (the armour plate is about 50-70mm, but well-sloped).
Post-war West Germany was rather evangelical about not appearing 'offensive', so they decided to build a tank with a good gun, minimal armour-protection and using high mobility to protect itself. The French went the same way with their AMX-30.
The trouble with this theory was that it was bollocks...
My wargames blog: http://www.jemimafawr.co.uk/
- grizzlymc
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
- Location: Sunny Sydney
- Contact:
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
An Aussie tanker said 80mm, but maybe that is a slope measurement. Yes, Mr Fisher could be excused that recipie; the huns had no excuse. I could never work out why they sold so well.
- BaronVonWreckedoften
- Grizzly Madam
- Posts: 9269
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:32 pm
- Location: The wilds of Surrey
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
Bribery. Same reason the Alpha-Jet outsold the infinitely superior BAe Hawk.
Kein Plan überlebt den ersten Kontakt mit den Würfeln. (No plan survives the first contact with the dice.)
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
Baron Mannshed von Wreckedoften, First Sea Lord of the Bavarian Admiralty.
Re: LAW 2019 Painting Challenge!
It's 80mm at the point on the gun-mantlet immediately surrounding the gun. 70mm for most of the rest of the turret-front and 50-70mm for the glacis. I seem to remember that when the slope is factored in it adds up to 110mm. Early models (Leopard 1 and 1A1) were less well-armoured and had applique rubber/steel sandwich armour stuck onto the turrets (becoming the 1A1A1, as seen here - the upgraded Dutch Leopard 1-V, also seen here, had the same applique armour pack, as did the late-model Leopard 1A5). The Aussies had a version of the Leopard 1A4, which was visually identical to the Canadian Leopard C1 (1A3). That version had slightly better turret armour than the basic 1A1.
My wargames blog: http://www.jemimafawr.co.uk/