RAF Painting Guide

For your Wargames Wittering
bangorstu
PurpleBot
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:06 am

RAF Painting Guide

Post by bangorstu »

OK, being a sucker for punishment, I've got a Fairey Battle to paint for my 15mm BEF army.

Question being....what colours to paint it? Now I know black underside and dark green/ dark brown but really need coat d'arms, army painter or vallejo colours to go for.

Many thanks in advance!
User avatar
RMD
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3581
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 3:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by RMD »

Humbrol 29 & 30 if you can find the equivalents?
bangorstu
PurpleBot
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:06 am

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by bangorstu »

Thanks!
User avatar
Buff Orpington
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3522
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:26 pm

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by Buff Orpington »

Got any equivalents for smoke & flames? My admiration for the guys who flew Battles into action knows no bounds, not so much for those who authorised the development. The Battle first flew in 1936, two years earlier the Germans flew the Do. 17. Did no-one read the signs?
I know when to go out
I know when to stay in
Get things done
User avatar
Zenbadger
Gaynor
Posts: 1137
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:51 pm
Location: Derbyshire, land of tarts and plague
Contact:

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by Zenbadger »

I know I use Vallejo English Uniform for RAF dark earth but I can't remember which green I use. I think it may be Russian Green.
User avatar
Slugbalancer
First Base
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:09 pm
Location: Romford
Contact:

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by Slugbalancer »

My 6mm H&R is painted using revell paints.
36182 Dark Earth
36168 Dark Green
36108 Black
They are pretty accurate colours.

Image
User avatar
grizzlymc
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9619
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
Location: Sunny Sydney
Contact:

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by grizzlymc »

Buff Orpington wrote: Sun Apr 29, 2018 7:52 pm Got any equivalents for smoke & flames? My admiration for the guys who flew Battles into action knows no bounds, not so much for those who authorised the development. The Battle first flew in 1936, two years earlier the Germans flew the Do. 17. Did no-one read the signs?
It wasn't that much worse than the Stuka. But trying to bomb well defended bridges was always going to end in tears.
Etranger
Jezebel
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:10 am
Location: The Athens of the South

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by Etranger »

Buff Orpington wrote: Sun Apr 29, 2018 7:52 pm Got any equivalents for smoke & flames? My admiration for the guys who flew Battles into action knows no bounds, not so much for those who authorised the development. The Battle first flew in 1936, two years earlier the Germans flew the Do. 17. Did no-one read the signs?

Bristol did (Blenheim series, much the same performance & capacity as the Dornier), the Air Ministry didn't.
bangorstu
PurpleBot
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:06 am

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by bangorstu »

The Battle did have the same bomb load as the Flying Pencil and was faster though.... and considerably more combat range.

So I suspect the problem was tactical use as much as anything.
User avatar
grizzlymc
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9619
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:33 am
Location: Sunny Sydney
Contact:

Re: RAF Painting Guide

Post by grizzlymc »

The whole air battle of France was a bit of a shambles, like the ground war, too much tokenism, not enough in the way of clear and simple objectives combined with doctrine and hardware to achieve those objectives. Maybe if fighters had hit the target 30 seconds earlier with strafing light bombs and other supression, but well coordinated attacks were not part of the doctrine of the time.
Post Reply